Re: PG list descriptions - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Jonathan S. Katz
Subject Re: PG list descriptions
Date
Msg-id A711ABD3-CC46-4F4A-A552-77C21E88B276@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG list descriptions  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: PG list descriptions  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-www
> On Aug 9, 2018, at 4:38 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul  2, 2018 at 03:08:17PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm suggesting updated language for the list descriptions.
>> I couldn't find an address for list admins, so I'm hoping some of them live
>> here (by design or by coincidence).
>>
>> On this page: https://www.postgresql.org/list/
>> I suggest to change from:
>> |    If it is a general usage question, we recommend subscribing to the pgsql-general@postgresql.org mailing list.
Ifit is a more technical question about how PostgreSQL internals work, we recommend subscribing to the
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.orgmailing list. 
>> to:
>> |    If you're a DBA, system administrator, or software developer with a question about or problem using PostgreSQL,
werecommend the pgsql-general@postgresql.org mailing list, which is monitored by many experienced PostgreSQL users who
mayoffer advice.  For discussion about development of PostgreSQL itself or questions about its internals, we recommend
thepgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list. 
>>
>> Here: https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-general/
>> I suggest to change from:
>> |    General discussion area for users. Apart from compile, acceptance test, and bug problems, most new users will
probablyonly be interested in this mailing list (unless they want to contribute to development or documentation). All
non-bugrelated questions regarding PostgreSQL's version of SQL, and all installation related questions that do not
involvebugs or failed compiles, should be restricted to this area. Please note that many of the developers monitor this
area.
>> to:
>> |    Discussion and questions for users of PostgreSQL, including software developers and database and system
administrators. Topics include advanced technical questions as well as general discussion.  Many of the PostgreSQL
developersmonitor and contribute here. 
>
> Can someone reply to this suggestion?  It looks valid to me.  I don't
> see this text in gitweb so it must be in a database somewhere.

It’s in pgarchives. It’s not accessible via the Django admin. I believe
Magnus would have to handle it.

Jonathan


Attachment

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PG list descriptions
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Updating docbot URLs