Re: Run pg_amcheck in 002_pg_upgrade.pl and 027_stream_regress.pl? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Dilger
Subject Re: Run pg_amcheck in 002_pg_upgrade.pl and 027_stream_regress.pl?
Date
Msg-id A549DD76-8DEC-41AE-9193-76683B2471C0@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Run pg_amcheck in 002_pg_upgrade.pl and 027_stream_regress.pl?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers

> On Apr 4, 2022, at 9:27 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>
> I'd really like it if amcheck had HOT chain verification. That's the
> other area where catching bugs passively with assertions and whatnot
> is clearly not good enough.

I agree, and was hoping to get around to this in the postgres 15 development cycle.  Alas, that did not happen.  Worse,
Ihave several other projects that will keep me busy for the next few months, at least. 

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Run pg_amcheck in 002_pg_upgrade.pl and 027_stream_regress.pl?
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Showing I/O timings spent reading/writing temp buffers in EXPLAIN