Hello, Robert
I’ve created a small test that reproduces the issue. With the proposed fix applied, the test passes, and the reconstruction behaves as expected.
I’m attaching the test for review. Please let me know if this looks OK or if you would like it changed.
Regards,
Oleg
On Dec 15, 2025, at 21:13, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 1:46 PM Oleg Tkachenko <oatkachenko@gmail.com> wrote:
Also, I’ve attached a patch based on your guidance. The changes are effectively the same as your suggested approach, but I would be happy to be listed as a contributor.
You'll certain be listed as the reporter for this issue when a fix is
committed. If you want to be listed as a co-author of the patch, I
think it is fair to say that it will need to contain some code written
by you. For example, maybe you would like to try writing a TAP test
case that fails without this fix and passes with it.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
