Re: Table Statistics with pgAdmin III - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Campbell, Lance
Subject Re: Table Statistics with pgAdmin III
Date
Msg-id A3AC4FA47DC0B1458C3E5396E685E63302395F0B@SAB-DC1.sab.uiuc.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Table Statistics with pgAdmin III  ("Dave Page" <dpage@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Table Statistics with pgAdmin III
List pgsql-performance
All of the fields are zero except for the three I listed in my posting.

Thanks,

Lance Campbell
Project Manager/Software Architect
Web Services at Public Affairs
University of Illinois
217.333.0382
http://webservices.uiuc.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Dave Page
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 12:50 PM
To: Jean-Max Reymond
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Table Statistics with pgAdmin III



> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Jean-Max Reymond <jmreymond@gmail.com>
> To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> Sent: 24/07/07, 18:23:53
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Table Statistics with pgAdmin III
>
> Campbell, Lance a écrit :
> > I have installed pgAdmin III 1.6.  In the tool when you click on a
> > particular table you can select a tab called "Statistics".  This tab has
> > all kinds of info on your table.  For some reason the only info I see is
> > for table size, toast table size and indexes size.  Is there a reason
> > that the other 15 fields have zeros in them?  I was thinking that maybe
> > I needed to turn on a setting within my database in order to get
> > statistics reported.
>
> it seems that the module pgstattuple is needed

That'll allow you to see extra stats in 1.8, but won't alter what you already see, in fact 1.6 won't use it at all.
Whatvalues are at zero? 

Regards, Dave

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Arnau
Date:
Subject: index over timestamp not being used
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: index over timestamp not being used