Re: Feature matrix filter - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Feature matrix filter
Date
Msg-id A37389BC-367B-4515-B88A-C7B5CF344EC2@pgadmin.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Feature matrix filter  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
List pgsql-www
Nope.

-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK:http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

On 13 Mar 2014, at 15:17, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:

On 13 March 2014 15:04, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
On 30 May 2013 23:12, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
On 30 May 2013 11:33, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
That should be the case with the "hide unchanged features" checkbox
checked anyway.  The rule is, if it's the same value across all
displayed versions (regardless of whether they're all "Yes", "No" or
"Obsolete"), the row becomes hidden.

Yeah, I get that. I'm just suggesting that obsolete features should be
treated differently, as they're even less interesting than something
that was implemented before the first version show.

Well it still seems like an unnecessary complication of yet another
checkbox for the sake of 6 affected features.  I could add it if you
really want it.  The rule would be that if any of the displayed
versions for a particular feature contain "Obsolete" then the row is
hidden.

Regardless of that, I do think that checkbox should be on it's own line.  And everything centred to look tidier.

Latest version does that.

And while we're doing this, would we want to add 7.4 back in?  It's in
the database anyway, or is it just too old?

So, with 9.4 coming up later this year, the feature matrix will be
overflowing many screens.

I've rebased the old patch and also included jQuery rather than
referring to a Google-hosted copy.

Works for me :-)

Any objections to me committing this?

--
Thom

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature matrix filter
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature matrix filter