Re: search_path vs extensions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: search_path vs extensions
Date
Msg-id A361A64F-38ED-47C4-A041-E6499715FC19@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: search_path vs extensions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On May 28, 2009, at 11:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> I suppose there might be some use-case involving concurrent  
> installation
> of multiple versions of the *same* extension, but I'm not sure we  
> should
> be designing around that as a key case.

Agreed. One thing at a time.

Best,

David


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions