> On 24 Jan 2025, at 21:07, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> On 2025-01-22 We 4:25 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>> Anyway, no fix was committed as far as I know. I would suggest it should be back-patched as well.
>
> I'm quite partial to the approach suggested upthread by Andres (a separate pg_gssapi.h file). If there's agreement on
thatI'm prepared to go and make it happen, unless Daniel beats me to it. Backpatching also seems reasonable.
Thanks for the reminder, I also agree that Andres' suggestion is the best
option. I hacked up a patch but got distracted by the pgcrypto GUC patch for a
bit. I'll share what I have once I've done a little testing.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
