Re: Win32 regression test status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers-win32

From Claudio Natoli
Subject Re: Win32 regression test status
Date
Msg-id A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F365@harris.memetrics.local
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Win32 regression test status  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers-win32
Hi guys,

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Agreed, we don't add them to all joins, but don't we historically add
> > ORDER BY to queries that are shown to be sensitive to qsort
> > implementations on various platforms?  Are you suggesting we create a
> > separate regression output file for that platform?
>
> I'm not suggesting any particular solution yet, just pointing out that
> there are reasons to look for alternatives rather than automatically
> adding ORDER BY.

Doesn't seem to be a consensus here, so:

Tom, I'm happy at looking at whatever alternatives you can suggest.

Bruce, failing the above, I'm happy to check + provide the required ORDER BY
patch.

Cheers,
Claudio



---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 regression test status
Next
From: Barry Lind
Date:
Subject: Thanks for the great work on the Win32 port