Re: Win32 regression test status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers-win32

From Claudio Natoli
Subject Re: Win32 regression test status
Date
Msg-id A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F361@harris.memetrics.local
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Win32 regression test status  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers-win32
[resurrecting this thread from the dead]

Tom Lane wrote:
> It's not mandated but we need to know why this platform acts
> differently from the rest.  The join failures look like it may be an issue

> of the qsort() implementation acting differently for equal keys than most
do.
> Not sure whether the same applies to rules.

Any "off the top of the head" ideas on how to confirm/test this? Or how to
proceed otherwise?

Now that the code to get stats working under win32 has been submitted, I'd
like to round these two failures out (not to mention looking into replacing
localtime et al with tzcode/zic), before cleaning up the remaining items for
win32.

Cheers,
Claudio

---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date:

Previous
From: Claudio Natoli
Date:
Subject: Re: APC + socket restrictions under Win32?
Next
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces]