Re: Anti join confusion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: Anti join confusion
Date
Msg-id 9f1fe4bb783eba3316e4d60d71f23efed75c0306.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Anti join confusion  (wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Anti join confusion
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2025-02-24 at 17:12 +0800, wenhui qiu wrote:
> Do we have plans for  NOT IN subquery  pull up?

As mentioned before, that is not possible.
Best practice is to avoid NOT IN with subqueries altogether.
The result is usually not what people expect it to be.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

--

*E-Mail Disclaimer*
Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail ist ausschliesslich fuer den
bezeichneten Adressaten bestimmt. Wenn Sie nicht der vorgesehene Adressat
dieser E-Mail oder dessen Vertreter sein sollten, so beachten Sie bitte,
dass jede Form der Kenntnisnahme, Veroeffentlichung, Vervielfaeltigung oder
Weitergabe des Inhalts dieser E-Mail unzulaessig ist. Wir bitten Sie, sich
in diesem Fall mit dem Absender der E-Mail in Verbindung zu setzen.

*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE & DISCLAIMER
*This message and any attachment are
confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure
and solely for the use of the person(s) or entity to whom it is intended.
If you have received this message in error and are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message and
any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, be
advised that any use of this message is prohibited and may be unlawful, and
you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to
any other person.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: MAX_BACKENDS size (comment accuracy)
Next
From: Jakub Wartak
Date:
Subject: Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability