Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: global index - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: global index
Date
Msg-id 9ed540ed-3319-ed73-1bc8-2153c29eb036@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: global index  (Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 08/24/2017 10:52 AM, Adam Brusselback wrote:
> My understanding is that global indexes allow foreign keys to work 
> naturally with partitioned tables, or tables in an inheritance 
> hierarchy.  That is pretty big IMO, as it allows you to partition a 
> table without making a trade-off in your database integrity.

It is, in fact the reason that even with 10 we don't really have 
partitioning as much as syntactical sugar for partitioning. (Not trying 
to take away from that, having the syntactical sugar is a huge first step).

JD


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc

PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.us
*****     Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.   *****



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] More replication race conditions
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM salt length