On 1/8/21 12:52 AM, Tatsuro Yamada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021/01/08 0:56, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On 1/7/21 3:47 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> On 2021-Jan-07, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/7/21 1:46 AM, Tatsuro Yamada wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I overlooked the check for MCV in the logic building query
>>>>> because I created the patch as a new feature on PG14.
>>>>> I'm not sure whether we should do back patch or not. However, I'll
>>>>> add the check on the next patch because it is useful if you decide to
>>>>> do the back patch on PG10, 11, 12, and 13.
>>>>
>>>> BTW perhaps a quick look at the other \d commands would show if
>>>> there are
>>>> precedents. I didn't have time for that.
>>>
>>> Yes, we do promise that new psql works with older servers.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, makes sense. That means we need add the check for 12 / MCV.
>
>
> Ah, I got it.
> I fixed the patch to work with older servers to add the checking
> versions. And I tested \dX command on older servers (PG10 - 13).
> These results look fine.
>
> 0001:
> Added the check code to handle pre-PG12. It has not MCV and
> pg_statistic_ext_data.
> 0002:
> This patch is the same as the previous patch (not changed).
>
> Please find the attached files.
>
OK, thanks. I'll take a look and probably push tomorrow. FWIW I plan to
squash the patches into a single commit.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
