Re: freezing a particular field in a table - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From hubert depesz lubaczewski
Subject Re: freezing a particular field in a table
Date
Msg-id 9e4684ce0511232338t342ba64ena5a3a14c0cfaa555@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: freezing a particular field in a table  (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>)
List pgsql-admin
On 11/23/05, Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> wrote:
  IF NEW.some_field IS DISTINCT FROM OLD.some_field THEN
IS DISTINCT FROM is like <> except that it treats NULL as an ordinary
value.


thanks - i didn't know about this operator.
 

> CREATE TRIGGER impossible_to_change BEFORE UPDATE ON some_table FOR EACH ROW
> EXECUTE PROCEDURE impossible_to_change();
If the table has other triggers and you don't want them to modify
the value either, then the check should probably go in an AFTER
trigger.

i would rather use before anyway.
the problem with after is that in aftrer - all you can do is to raise exception. while - if you would like to value to stick - you would ahve to change the code *and* change trigger declaration. putting it in before solves the problem.
of course there might be problem with another triggers, but that's another story.

depesz

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: freezing a particular field in a table
Next
From: Johnson Zhao
Date:
Subject: Problems when initdb on WinXP with SP2.