Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date
Msg-id 9dba95df-982e-da50-c8f3-7601fbfbda29@iki.fi
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
List pgsql-hackers
On 17/06/2021 08:45, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> Another problem with directly scanning the directory is, how we
> are supposed to get the "relpersistence" which is stored in pg_class
> tuple right?

You only need relpersistence if you want to use the buffer cache, right? 
I think that's a good argument for not using it.

- Heikki



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Decoding speculative insert with toast leaks memory