On 2 Sep 2025 at 20:56 +0200, v@viktorh.net <v@viktorh.net>, wrote:
Hello, I was working on my own patch for the same thing, until I found this was already there. I think this would be very useful for a lot of people. Do you need any help moving this forward Anderas? I have both tests and docs written, although not for the FOR UPDATE part.
On 25 Jun 2025, at 13:39, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2025 at 19:33, Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> wrote:
I have fixed that one and some other issues locally and will submit a new version in a while after I have added more tests because you are very correct in that a big issue with my last version of the patch was the big lack of tests and lack of making sure all features which interact with UPSERT actually worked with my changes. Plus some islation tests would be nice to have.
+1. Don't forget to move the CF entry to the next open CF.
FYI, over on [1] I proposed more tests and doc updates for RLS. I think those updates might make it easier to test and document the RLS aspects of this patch.
