On 09/27/2016 11:22 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
>> Hmm, yeah, that'd be nice to fix. I'd like to see a patch specifically to
>> fix that. I'm not convinced that we need all the complications of this
>> patch, to get that fixed. (In particular, indexam's still wouldn't need to
>> care about the different between CHECK_UNIQUE_PARTIAL and
>> CHECK_UNIQUE_SPECULATIVE, I think.)
>
> But you are convinced that everything else I describe would do it?
I didn't think very hard about it, but yeah, think so..
- Heikki