On 31/07/2019 18:37, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> On 7/31/19 11:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes:
>>> On 7/30/19 7:43 PM, Nasby, Jim wrote:
>>>> My concern about calling this -extensions is that it’s really meant for people that are at least at the level of C
extensions(and probably only those making use of hooks). That’s a relatively small number of extensions, even if they
aresome of the most important extensions.
>>
>>> Well, that may become self-evident based on the discussions on the
>>> -extensions mailing list ;)
>>
>> Yeah, but "-forks" doesn't seem to capture the proposed discussion
>> space very well either. I also dislike that name because it seems to
>> be encouraging people to use community resources to discuss projects
>> that are, um, not exactly well connected to the community.
>> "-extensions" seems better from that standpoint.
>>
>> Somebody previously suggested "pgsql-extension-hackers", which is a
>> bit long but might help to push the technical content towards the
>> level Jim is hoping for.
>
> +1 for -extension-hackers as an alternative.
>
+1 For this too.
--
Petr Jelinek
2ndQuadrant - PostgreSQL Solutions for the Enterprise
https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
