Re: Support to define custom wait events for extensions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiro Ikeda
Subject Re: Support to define custom wait events for extensions
Date
Msg-id 9b7a7edfc9fbe8dad9f0e35ada6d0c7e@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support to define custom wait events for extensions  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2023-06-16 16:46, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 11:14:05AM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
>> I tried to query on pg_stat_activity to check the background worker
>> invoked by pg_prewarm. But, I found that pg_stat_activity doesn't show
>> it although I may be missing something...
>> 
>> So, I tried to implement TAP tests. But I have a problem with it.
>> I couldn't find the way to check the status of another backend
>> while the another backend wait with custom wait events.
> 
> Hmm.  Right.  It seems to me that BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION
> is required in this case, with BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection()
> to connect to a database (or not, like the logical replication
> launcher if only access to shared catalogs is wanted).
> 
> I have missed that the leader process of pg_prewarm does not use that,
> because it has no need to connect to a database, but its workers do.
> So it is not going to show up in pg_stat_activity.

Yes. Thanks to your advice, I understood that
BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION is the reason.

I could make the TAP test that invokes a background worker waiting 
forever
and checks its custom wait event in pg_stat_activity. So, I'll make 
patches
including test codes next week.

Regards,
-- 
Masahiro Ikeda
NTT DATA CORPORATION



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Next
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we want a hashset type?