Re: PostgreSQL 15-->18 slowdown? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Israel Brewster
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 15-->18 slowdown?
Date
Msg-id 9FB992C2-0A1D-4BFE-8066-77F130471B9B@alaska.edu
Whole thread
In response to Re: PostgreSQL 15-->18 slowdown?  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL 15-->18 slowdown?
List pgsql-general
On Jun 26, 2026, at 10:14 AM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:



On 6/26/26 10:58 AM, Israel Brewster wrote:
In postgreSQL 15, I had the below query that worked quickly. Now, I make no claims that the query is the best possible, or even a good query, but it DID work, and it did so quickly enough to be un-noticable when running.
Then I upgrade to PostgreSQL 18 - and now the query never completes (as in, I get a command timeout after at least half an hour before I get a result). Looking at the EXPLAIN (https://explain.depesz.com/s/llAQ <https://explain.depesz.com/s/llAQ>) makes it pretty obvious why: we have a sequence scan on a large table inside a nested loop - and that sequence scan is apparently not short circuiting.

The link provided shows no times or rows, did you pick the correct one?
I tried the obvious: REINDEX database and VACUUM ANALYZE, but neither helped. I have my default_statistics_target set to 500 at the moment.
Then I tried SET enable_seqscan = off; Lo and behold, the query ran in only 123.888 ms (fun number :-D ) - https://explain.depesz.com/s/K2K9 <https://explain.depesz.com/s/K2K9>

This one does not show the actual query.

Right, sorry. It’s the same query as in the first one though. Only difference is sequence scan off.

---
Israel Brewster
Software Engineer
Alaska Volcano Observatory 
Geophysical Institute - UAF 
2156 Koyukuk Drive 
Fairbanks AK 99775-7320
Work: 907-474-5172
cell:  907-328-9145




---
Israel Brewster
Software Engineer
Alaska Volcano Observatory
Geophysical Institute - UAF
2156 Koyukuk Drive
Fairbanks AK 99775-7320
Work: 907-474-5172
cell:  907-328-9145


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 15-->18 slowdown?
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 15-->18 slowdown?