Re: [GENERAL] Performance of full outer join in 8.3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Performance of full outer join in 8.3
Date
Msg-id 9B0D1547-B358-426B-A6DC-4A3D2E97F236@pointblue.com.pl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Performance of full outer join in 8.3  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Performance of full outer join in 8.3
List pgsql-hackers
On 16 Apr 2009, at 19:41, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
> Is that because of how the output is formatted though, or because the
> concepts are difficult to express? (I agree though, json is better
> especially for structures that are possibly highly nested).
What I mean is that what postgresql displays currently as  
explain(analyze[verbose]) is clear and understandable.
Also, it is getting better and better from version to version. So I  
don't personally agree, that it is unreadable - and I am up for (and I  
am sure many users like me are) JSON, or XML output.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sam Mason
Date:
Subject: Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings