Re: Better management of mergejoinable operators - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Glaesemann
Subject Re: Better management of mergejoinable operators
Date
Msg-id 9AC566F7-FF38-4987-B252-A4D5B730F318@seespotcode.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Better management of mergejoinable operators  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Better management of mergejoinable operators  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Dec 13, 2006, at 7:56 , Tom Lane wrote:

> Right offhand I cannot see a reason why there should be different
> equality operators with the same sortops.  (If anyone can come up with
> a plausible scenario for that, stop me here...)  So what I'm thinking
> about is a unique index on oprlsortop/oprrsortop; that would both  
> allow
> efficient search, and prevent multiple answers.

I think this makes sense. Would this be affected at all by equality  
of text strings, taking into account locale? Or would there be  
equality for text in each locale (so oprlsortop and oprrsortop would  
always be not only the same type (text) but also of the same locale)?  
I'd think this is would be the case so it wouldn't end up being a  
problem.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: psql commandline conninfo
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Better management of mergejoinable operators