Schema version control - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Royce Ausburn
Subject Schema version control
Date
Msg-id 9A66BCED-CBEE-47F3-83B0-3AAED4A13C49@inomial.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Schema version control  (Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>)
Re: Schema version control  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
Re: Schema version control  (Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Hi all,

My company is having trouble managing how we upgrade schema changes across many versions of our software.  I imagine
thisis a common problem and there're probably some neat solutions that we don't know about.   

For the last 10 years we have been writing bash shell scripts essentially numbered in order db0001, db0002, db0003....
Thenumber represents the schema version which is recorded in the database and updated by the shell scripts.  We have a
templatethat provides all the functionality we need, we just copy the script and fill in the blanks.  The schema
upgradescripts are committed to svn along with the software changes, and we have a process when installing the software
ata site that runs the scripts on the DB in order before starting up the new version of the software. 

This has worked really well so far.  But  we've effectively only had one version of the software in development at any
time. We're now in the habit of branching the software to form releases to promote stability when making large changes.
The idea is that only really important changes are merged in to the releases.  This introduces a bit of a problem when
somechange needs to be merged from one release to another.  The typical problem is that we might have two versions of
thesoftware 10.0 at schema version 10057 and 11.0 at 11023 and we need to merge an important bug fix from schema 11023
into 10.0.  The issue is that 11023 might depend upon changes introduced in the schema versions before it.  Or 11023
mightintroduce changes that cause later scripts to break (11000 - 11023) when upgrading from 10.0 to 11.0. 

One potential solution is to require that schema changes are never merged in to a release, but of course sometimes
businessrequires we do =( 

I'm really interested to hear how you guys manage schema upgrades in the face of branches and upgrading from many
differentversions of the database. 

I've been reading http://pyrseas.wordpress.com/2011/02/07/version-control-part-2-sql-databases/ but I have a feeling
thatthis blog post won't address branches. 

Cheers!

--Royce


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Raymond O'Donnell
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY statement REAL vs VARCHAR precision issue
Next
From: Andy Colson
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema version control