Re: Script binaries renaming - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Script binaries renaming
Date
Msg-id 9998.1206496799@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Script binaries renaming  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Script binaries renaming  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: Script binaries renaming  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Where are we on this?  Tom thinks we don't want this.  TODO has:
>       * Prefix command-line utilities like createuser with 'pg_'
>         http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00025.php

It wasn't just me; quite a few people were dubious about it when the
patch was submitted.  See the thread here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-07/msg00055.php

> One idea is to keep the existing commands and just add pg_* (or pg*) to
> additional versions, with the idea that the original versions will be
> removed some day.

AFAICS the only argument for doing this is to eliminate confusion and
potential conflicts, which means that we get no benefit at all until we
actually do remove the old names.  So if we're going to do this, we have
to make a commitment that we're going to remove the old names within the
reasonably foreseeable future (say, about two releases out).

Are we really prepared to break everyone's scripts for this?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing Transaction Start/End Contention
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql Plan Invalidation and search_path