Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>> We avoided this with oids but it seems we have added another. I don't
>>> see a good way of avoiding this like we had with oids.
>>
>> Isn't that what hte proposed (or implemented?) "SET DEFAULT_TABLESPACE"
>> was for?
> No. I think it was for allowing the table to be created even if the
> tablespace doesn't exist.
Yes, that's exactly what it was for. I thought you had figured it out
as of your previous post ...
regards, tom lane
