Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY?
Date
Msg-id 9902.1490846062@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> we have a good number of '(GISTENTRY *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(n)' in our
> code - looks a bit better & shorter to have PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY(n).

Should be PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY_P to match existing conventions,
otherwise +1
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical decoding on standby
Next
From: Vitaly Burovoy
Date:
Subject: Re: sequence data type