Re: pg_amcheck contrib application - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Dilger
Subject Re: pg_amcheck contrib application
Date
Msg-id 98A8DC97-A585-44D8-9F79-B8232B8FABE3@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_amcheck contrib application  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: pg_amcheck contrib application  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

> On Apr 19, 2021, at 5:07 PM, Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Apr 19, 2021, at 12:50 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 1:07 PM Mark Dilger
>> <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>> I have added the verb "has" rather than "contains" because "has" is more consistent with the phrasing of other
similarcorruption reports. 
>>
>> That makes sense.

I have refactored the patch to address your other concerns.  Breaking the patch into multiple pieces didn't add any
clarity,but refactoring portions of it made things simpler to read, I think, so here it is as one patch file. 



—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company




Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Stellard
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we work with LLVM 12 on s390x?
Next
From: Masahiro Ikeda
Date:
Subject: Re: wal stats questions