Quoting Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>:
> > I'm concearned about this because we are going to switch our
> > fist server to a Journaling FS (on Linux). Searching and asking
> > I found out that for our short term work we need ReiserFS (it's
> > for a proxy server). Put the interesting thing was that for
> > large (very large) files, everybody recomends XFS. The drawback
> > of XFS is that it's very, very sloooow when deleting files.
>
> Why do all these file systems seem to have one major negative?
In the case of XFS they told me that it was slow deleting, but I guess that they
were trying to tell me that reiser would do the job on a proxy cache better then
XFS.
Everybody put there thumbs-up to XFS when talking about databases (because of
the large file size).
Saludos... :-)
--
El mejor sistema operativo es aquel que te da de comer.
Cuida tu dieta.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Marques | mmarques@unl.edu.ar
Programador, Administrador | Centro de Telematica Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
-----------------------------------------------------------------
