Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions
Date
Msg-id 984633.1742481351@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> On 19.03.25 20:25, Matheus Alcantara wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 3:56 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Buildfarm member snakefly doesn't like this too much.

> I was able to reproduce the problem from scratch using:

> ./configure ...
> make  # no contrib
> make -C src/test/modules/test_extensions check

> So it depended on in which order you build the various components.

That makes sense, but I wonder how snakefly hit it while other BF
animals did not.  It's running a reasonably up-to-date BF client
version and there's nothing odd-looking about its configuration.

Anyway, I see snakefly is green now so that tweak did fix it.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions