Re: pg_dump sort order for functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: pg_dump sort order for functions
Date
Msg-id 9837222c1001120653w61c1fa96hd3a5040e719c36a6@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump sort order for functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_dump sort order for functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 15:44, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> On mån, 2010-01-11 at 12:54 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> -- Name: binary_coercible(oid, oid); Type: FUNCTION; Schema: public; Owner: postgres
>
>> Um, that tag is the "name", and if you change that, the name in CREATE
>> FUNCTION also changes.
>
> So?

Sorry if this is talking about something completely different, haven't
followed the thread closely, but: will this change the output of
pg_restore -l? If so, changing the tag is likely to break scripts, and
IMHO should be avoided if possible.


-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump sort order for functions
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Typed tables