On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:21, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> However, wouldn't it make more logical sense to replace "host/hostssl"
>> with "replication/replicationssl" rather than overload the database
>> field?
>
> Seems good. How about the following formats?
>
> replication user CIDR-address auth-method [auth-options]
> replicationssl user CIDR-address auth-method [auth-options]
> replication user IP-address IP-mask auth-method [auth-options]
> replicationssl user IP-address IP-mask auth-method [auth-options]
>
> Note that "database" field has been removed since it's useless
> for replication.
Hm, no, I think I withdraw my comment about pg_hba.conf. It seems
better to overload the database name here. I'm not particularly keen
on yet another different set of columns, which is what happens when
you remove the database field.
-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
