Re: Build sizes vs docs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Build sizes vs docs
Date
Msg-id 9837222c0912090903j69e6dd56lbb603ed0c1e29b9a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Build sizes vs docs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Build sizes vs docs  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
2009/12/9 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> Perhaps we should just add it to the release checklist to verify that
>> they are reasonably correct?
>
> Go for it.  Now that you mention it, there are some memory-usage tables
> in the documentation about shared memory configuration that also have
> a pretty short half-life, and should be rechecked.

Done.

They're up-to-date per 8.3, btw. Are there changes in 8.4 that should
be put in? If so, it would be good to include it before the next minor
release, so the proper data goes up on the website.


-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Build sizes vs docs
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Build sizes vs docs