Re: Client application name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Client application name
Date
Msg-id 9837222c0910210347w59fee9c3u11f40f75c650959b@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Client application name  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:49, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>> Another idea is to do something similar to the 'prefer' SSL mode, or if
>> the server doesn't support protocol version 3: Try with the GUC in
>> startup packet first, and if that fails, retry without it.
>>
>> I'm not sure if I like either of those better than the extra SET
>> command, but I thought I'd mention it.
>
> The command line sure seems ugly if that's what you meant. Retrying
> doesn't seem so bad, though it'll still litter server logs with
> connection errors.

It'd definitely be good if we can avoid littering the server logs with
it. It's bad enough in some SSL situations already :(


-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Client application name
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Client application name