2009/10/13 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Actually, I found a note that said it's recommended to never increase
>>> it about 65535 - so perhaps we should put our limit at that instead od
>>> 32767?
>
>> Yeah, setting it at 65535 seems like a good idea then. I'm tempted to
>> backport this, although it's not strictly speaking a bug fix. Any
>> objections?
>
> Why isn't it a bug fix? =A0+1 for backport ...
Yeah, +1 there.
--=20
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
