Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows
Date
Msg-id 9837222c0908100441p55e468dx94441d5c470155bb@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 17:05, Magnus Hagander<magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> Dave has built binaries for 8.3.7 and 8.4.0 for this, available at:
>
> http://developer.pgadmin.org/~dpage/postgres_exe_virtualalloc-8_3.zip
> http://developer.pgadmin.org/~dpage/postgres_exe_virtualalloc-8_4.zip
>
>
> We would like as many people as possible to test this both on systems
> that currently experience the problem and systems that don't, and let
> us know the status. To test, just replace your current postgres.exe
> binary with the one in the appropriate ZIP file above. Obviously, take
> a backup before you do it! These binaries contain just this one patch
> - the rest of what's been applied to the 8.3 and 8.4 branches for the
> next minor version is *not* included.

It's been a couple of weeks now, and I've had a number of reports both
on-list, on-blog and in private, from people using this. I have not
yet had a single report of a problem caused by this patch (not
counting the case where there was a version mismatch - can't fault the
patch for that).

Given that, I say we apply this for 8.3 and 8.4 now. Comments?


-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: machine-readable explain output v4
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Multicore builds on MSVC