On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 16:01, Magnus Hagander<magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> Andrew Chernow wrote:
>>
>>> The only issue now is a small leak of memory in a function that is only
>>> called a fixed (and very small) number of times per process. Given this,
>>> I'm inclined to say we should put it on hold for 8.5. Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Doesn't sound urgent to me. =A0If it were my decision, I'd punt it to 8.=
5.
>
> Ok. Agreed then - added to the commitfest page.
Applied to HEAD.
--=20
Magnus Hagander
Self: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/