Re: Is the pg_isready database name relevant? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Is the pg_isready database name relevant?
Date
Msg-id 982229.1764010063@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is the pg_isready database name relevant?  (Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> writes:
> "Option exists, is mentioned in --help, but doesn't do anything" is a (very
> low priority) bug.  That's plain and simple.

Plain, simple, and wrong.  It does do something.  Maybe not something
you care about, but that could be said of a lot of options.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: Is the pg_isready database name relevant?
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: Is the pg_isready database name relevant?