Y2K compliant - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Justin Hickey
Subject Y2K compliant
Date
Msg-id 9806151626.ZM28108@impact1.hpcc.nectec.or.th
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-general
Hello all,

I was recently asked to determine if PostgreSQL was Y2K compliant. Looking at
the questions archive, I found the following:

On April 13, 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart writes:
> For Postgres v6.3 (and earlier) the default date/time style is "traditional
> Postgres". In future releases, the default may become ISO-8601, which
> alleviates date specification ambiguities and Y2K collation problems.

Does this imply that PostgreSQL is not Y2K compliant but will be in a future
release?

BTW please CC any replies since I am not on the mailing list.

Thank you in advance for any information.

--
Sincerely,

Jazzman (a.k.a. Justin Hickey)  e-mail: jhickey@hpcc.nectec.or.th
High Performance Computing Center
National Electronics and Computer Technology Center (NECTEC)
Bangkok, Thailand
==================================================================
People who think they know everything are very irritating to those
of us who do.  ---Anonymous

Jazz and Trek Rule!!!
==================================================================

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Dwight Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] Postgresql-Perl -->PQexec() -- there is no connection to the backend
Next
From: "Anton Stöckl"
Date:
Subject: array question