Re: [HACKERS] inherited sequences and primary keys - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
Subject Re: [HACKERS] inherited sequences and primary keys
Date
Msg-id 9804030731.AA12288@hawk.illustra.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] inherited sequences and primary keys  ("Maurice Gittens" <mgittens@gits.nl>)
List pgsql-hackers
Maurice:
> IMO the current semantics for inheritance in Postgresql are broken.

It seems that way.

> I've been wanting to do something about it but I got distracted and started
> to debug some other problems in the system.
>
> I hope to get back to this some time.
>
> I personally feel that we have to make some choices:
>
>     Is postgresql going to be an Object Relational dbms or is it going to
>     be yet another relation dbms?
>
> When the developers make an explicite choice on this point it will be a
> Good Thing (tm).

Agreed. There are lots of pretty decent relation dbms's out there. There are
very few Object Relational dbms's. I happen to think ORDBMS is a really cool
idea and have seen some great applications done with it that a straight
up RDBMS just couldn't do. So my vote is for ORDBMS.

That said, postgresql needs to become a much better RDBMS that it currently
is.

-dg

David Gould            dg@illustra.com           510.628.3783 or 510.305.9468
Informix Software  (No, really)         300 Lakeside Drive  Oakland, CA 94612
 - Linux. Not because it is free. Because it is better.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Its not my fault. Its SEG's FAULT!
Next
From: "Vadim B. Mikheev"
Date:
Subject: Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] inherited sequences and primary keys