Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Date
Msg-id 97a994ff-8f0f-4a24-f668-0b58bbb4624b@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 04/10/2018 12:51 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -hackers,
> 
> The thread is picking up over on the ext4 list. They don't update their 
> archives as often as we do, so I can't link to the discussion. What 
> would be the preferred method of sharing the info?

Thanks to Anthony for this link:

http://lists.openwall.net/linux-ext4/2018/04/10/33

It isn't quite real time but it keeps things close enough.

jD


> 
> Thanks,
> 
> JD
> 
> 


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
***  A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is.  ***
PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
*****     Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.   *****


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Reopen logfile on SIGHUP