Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrey M. Borodin
Subject Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL
Date
Msg-id 9792FB93-C56F-48A9-9591-BA75B1C28B52@yandex-team.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL  (Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>)
List pgsql-hackers

> On 24 Jul 2024, at 13:58, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 at 15:22, Andrei Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>> I'd like to have GROUP BY AUTO (I also proposed version GROUP BY SURPRISE ME). But I wouldn't like to open pandora
boxof syntax sugar extensions which may will be incompatible with future standards. 
>> If we could have extensible grammar - I'd be happy to have a lot of such enhancements. My top 2 are FROM table
SELECTcolumn and better GROUP BY. 
>
> Personally my number one enhancement would be allowing a trailing
> comma after the last column in the SELECT clause.

Yes, trailing comma sounds great too.

One more similar syntax sugar I can think of. I see lots of queries like
SELECT somtheing
FROM table1
WHERE 1=1
and id = x
--and col1 = val1
and col2 = val2

I was wondering where does that "1=1" comes from. It's because developer comment condition one by one like "--, col1 =
val1".And they do not want to cope with and\or continuation. 


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

PS. Seems like Mail.App mangled my previous message despite using plain text. It's totally broken in archives...


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: Removing unneeded self joins
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: PG buildfarm member cisticola