Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Is there a real downside to promoting the launcher to be a
>> pseudo-backend?
> Aside from the fact that we don't have any pseudo-backend yet, I don't
> see any ...
Well, I meant pseudo-backend in the sense of "just like an AV worker".
We might not want it to show in pg_stat_activity, but otherwise I think
it'd be the same.
regards, tom lane
