Re: Sponsoring enterprise features - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Sponsoring enterprise features
Date
Msg-id 9720.1069395653@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sponsoring enterprise features  (Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>)
Responses Re: Sponsoring enterprise features
List pgsql-hackers
Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca> writes:
> Personally, I think the best way is simply to make a post on -hackers
> with a description of what you want to accomplish with a call for
> estimates and proposals. ...
> I say a description of what you want to accomplish because certain
> features are not as useful on PostgreSQL as they are other databases
> (data partitioning being one of them, due to the ability to use partial
> indexes) so you may not achieve what you are expecting.

Right.  You can in any case get a great deal of free advice by starting
a pghackers discussion ;-)

It should be noted that "because Oracle does it that way" is a
guaranteed nonstarter as a rationale for any Postgres feature proposal.
There are enough differences between Postgres and Oracle that you will
need to do significant investigation before assuming that an Oracle-
based feature design is appropriate for Postgres.  Aside from technical
differences, we have fundamentally different priorities --- one of which
is simplicity of administration.  You'll get no buyin on proposals that
tend to create Oracle-like difficulties of installation and tuning.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: code question: rewriteDefine.c
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] More detail on settings for pgavd?