Re: v13: Performance regression related to FORTIFY_SOURCE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: v13: Performance regression related to FORTIFY_SOURCE
Date
Msg-id 971466883e0a6a0aeea71821c0c909a549bf875c.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: v13: Performance regression related to FORTIFY_SOURCE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 21:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think what'd make more sense is to file this as a gcc bug ("why
> doesn't
> it remove the useless object size check?") 

Filed:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95556

Regards,
    Jeff Davis





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Atomic operations within spinlocks
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: v13: Performance regression related to FORTIFY_SOURCE