On 02.09.26 21:29, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> As such, unless we are misunderstanding something about the
> discussion, we feel it would be better to revert this in 19. That
> would take off the time pressure now and would make it easier to fix
> these things properly in 20 without having to be burdened by backwards
> compatibility and backpatching.
Ok, let's do it.
For clarification: Revert from REL_19_STABLE only, or also from master?
