Re: Bitnami deprecation - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Bitnami deprecation
Date
Msg-id 96D5C4F9-08FC-432A-BBBA-AA3BD0D0A830@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bitnami deprecation  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Responses Re: Bitnami deprecation
List pgsql-general
> On 11 Aug 2025, at 17:49, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
> On 8/11/25 08:33, Smith wrote:

>> Not sure where to post this but the Postgres team should consider pulling the promotion for Bitnami on the downloads
page.
>> See:
>> https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/35164

Reading that doesn't make it obvious that we should remove Bitnami from the
page, they are still offering (what they now call hardened images) postgresql:

https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnamisecure/postgresql

Looking at their catalog they are up to date with the most recent 16 minor
release but no 17 version AFAICT.

https://app-catalog.vmware.com/bitnami/apps/33ff5603-01b2-4310-a541-0d24b516cb56

Keeping it on the other hand opens the question of why we aren't linking to
other similar distributions and operators.

> Yeah, going here:
> https://bitnami.com/tag/postgresql
> gets a 404 page.

Right, that clearly needs to be fixed.

--
Daniel Gustafsson




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: px shi
Date:
Subject: Re: Questions about the continuity of WAL archiving
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: Inquiry: Using PostgreSQL as a Staging Database for SAP ERP Data Export