Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message
Date
Msg-id 967.1447711806@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On 11/15/15 9:50 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> I'd prefer to omit fields if explicitly assigned to NULL. You can always
>> use coalesce if you want the string 'NULL'; I agree with others here
>> that the vast majority of users will want the field just omitted.

> I think the problem was that you can't omit the primary message.

If you ask me, that would be a feature not a bug.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: CustomScan in a larger structure (RE: CustomScan support on readfuncs.c)