Re: Deleted WAL files held open by backends in Linux - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Deleted WAL files held open by backends in Linux
Date
Msg-id 964.1259680366@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Deleted WAL files held open by backends in Linux  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: Deleted WAL files held open by backends in Linux
List pgsql-hackers
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Is there a reasonably cheap way to check whether the backend has a
> WAL file open and whether that one is the current append target?

Detecting whether we have a WAL file open is trivial (just look at
the static variable holding the file descriptor).  Determining whether
it's still the current append target is not so cheap though; it would
require examining shared-memory status which means taking a lock on
that status (and it's a high-traffic lock already).

We could have the open WAL file dropped if stale as a side-effect
anytime we have occasion to examine that shared state anyway.  But
in a nearly-read-only session such as your example I'm not sure that
would happen often enough to fix the problem.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Windows x64
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks