Re: Re: proposal: variadic argument support for least, greatestfunction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: Re: proposal: variadic argument support for least, greatestfunction
Date
Msg-id 95b90015-8588-3668-3fd8-587afb85f2bf@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: proposal: variadic argument support for least, greatest function  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
Responses Re: proposal: variadic argument support for least, greatest function
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/1/19 3:59 AM, Chapman Flack wrote:
> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> make installcheck-world:  tested, passed
> Implements feature:       tested, passed
> Spec compliant:           not tested
> Documentation:            tested, passed
> 
> For completeness, I'll mark this reviewed again. It passes installcheck-world, the latest patch addresses the
suggestionsfrom me, and is improved on the code-structure matters that Tom pointed out. I don't know if it will meet
Tom'sthreshold for desirability overall, but that sounds like a committer call at this point, so I'll change it to
RfC.

Both committers who have looked at this patch (Tom, and Andres in his 
patch roundup [1]) recommend that it be rejected.

If no committer steps up in the next week I think we should mark it as 
rejected.

Regards,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net

[1] 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190214203752.t4hl574k6jlu4t25%40alap3.anarazel.de


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Online verification of checksums
Next
From: "Daniel Verite"
Date:
Subject: Re: insensitive collations