Re: Open 7.3 items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Open 7.3 items
Date
Msg-id 9566.1029522563@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Open 7.3 items  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Open 7.3 items  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Open 7.3 items  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Open 7.3 items  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Open 7.3 items  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Open 7.3 items  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
BTW, I just thought of a small improvement to your patch that eliminates
some of the ugliness.  Suppose that when we recognize an attempt to
connect as a global user (ie, feature flag is on and last character of
username is '@'), we strip off the '@' before proceeding.  Then we would
have:global users appear in pg_shadow as foolocal users appear in pg_shadow as foo@db
and what this would mean is that you can flip between feature-enabled
and feature-disabled states without breaking your global logins.  So you
don't need the extra step of creating a "postgres@" before turning on
the feature.  (Which was pretty ugly anyway, since even though postgres@
could be made a superuser, he wouldn't be the same user as postgres ---
this affects table ownership, for example, and would be a serious issue
if you wanted any non-superuser global users.)

I suppose some might argue that having to say postgres@ to log in,
when your username is really just postgres as far as you can see in the
database, is a tad confusing.  But the whole thing is an acknowledged
wart anyway, and I think getting rid of the two problems mentioned above
is worth it.

Also, if we do this then it's important to strip a trailing '@' only
if it's the *only* one in the given username.  Else a local user
'foo@db1' could cheat to log into db2 by saying username = 'foo@db1@'
with requested database db2.  But I can't see any other security hole.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 items
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 issues