Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas Karlsson
Subject Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Date
Msg-id 9523ad05-525c-598e-ad2d-061b5a94062c@proxel.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/26/2018 03:28 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I'm a big fan of this patch but it doesn't appear to have made any
> progress in quite a while.  Is there any chance we can get an updated
> patch and perhaps get another review before the end of this CF...?

Sorry, as you may have guessed I do not have the time right now to get 
this updated during this commitfest.

> Refactoring this to have an internal representation between
> ProcessUtility() and DefineIndex doesn't sound too terrible and if it
> means the ability to reuse that, seems like it'd be awful nice to do
> so..

I too like the concept, but have not had the time to look into it.

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitionedtables